2 posts • Page 1 of 1
Better supported method?Dr.,
Each time my dose of Celexa is raised, there is marked additional benefit, but continued mild symptoms (milder and less frequent with each dose increase). Occasionally there is a more severe breakthrough like the past 2 days, but that is out of almost 9 weeks at 40mg. of Celexa without such a breakthrough and I am feeling better as the day goes on. I have read some relatively recent studies, one that showed an increase in fluoxetine to higher than standard dosages was more effective than augmentation in depression partial responders (quite a bit more). I have seen similar studies in partial responses for OCD The "flat dose-response curve" seems less clear than in the past. If response is improved with each dose increase, but remission is still elusive and breakthroughs occur, which becomes the better-supported approach - augmenting/adjunctive therapy, or maximizing dose to highest tolerable limits within manufacturer recommendations? Thanks as always.
Re: Better supported method?It is unknown which is better. There are no head to head trials and opinions vary by region.
[quote] Dr. , Each time my dose of Celexa is raised, there is marked additional benefit, but continued mild symptoms (milder and less frequent with each dose increase)... [/quote]
2 posts • Page 1 of 1
|
|||||||








